Rose & Daffodil
Grant Programs

Our leading grant programs for Oregon nonprofits

OPENS MONDAY, JUNE 16

AN OVERVIEW

The Rose and Daffodil programs are those from which the majority of our funding stems. These programs share an application, and while applicants are invited to identify their program preference, our evaluative team will discern the best program fit after application submission.

ROSE GRANT

Our Rose Grants are our most common award, often awarded to new and returning applicants alike. Our average Rose Grant is roughly $30,000 and remains highly competitive, with approximately sixty (60) awards issued each cycle.

DAFFODIL GRANT

Our Daffodil Grants are highly competitive, often favoring returning partners with whom we have worked many times. Our average Daffodil Grant is roughly $120,000 and remains highly competitive, with only fifteen (15) awards issued each cycle.

APPLICANT REQUIREMENTS

  • Eligible applicants must be either an IRS-designated 501(c)(3) public charity, a government entity, or a Tribal government. Government entities can include public schools, libraries, museums, or state and local agencies. Unfortunately, fiscally-sponsored organizations are not eligible to apply for funding at this time.

  • Operating expenses for a nonprofit include the costs of running the organization—such as staff salaries, rent, utilities, program-related expenses, and other day-to-day needs.

    For Rose Grants, an organization must have reported operating expenses of approximately $250,000 or more in its most recently completed fiscal year.

    For Daffodil Grants, an organization must have reported operating expenses of approximately $500,000 or more in its most recently completed fiscal year.

  • The Rose and Daffodil grant programs are dedicated to supporting partners that are both headquartered in and primarily serving Oregon communities. By focusing on locally rooted organizations, we aim to ensure that resources stay within the state and are directed toward meeting the unique needs and priorities of our home communities.

  • Eligible applicants must have financial statements that capture a full and complete fiscal year of operation. Preference may be awarded to organizations with 2+ years of financial records.

  • Committed to Equity
    Eligible organizations must demonstrate an active and intentional commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion. This includes incorporating equitable practices across leadership, staffing, programming, and community engagement. We seek partners who are continuously working to reduce barriers and promote belonging for all.

    LGBTQ2IA+ inclusion
    Organizations must affirm and support the rights of LGBTQ2IA+ individuals. This includes allowing employees to openly identify as LGBTQ+, and to date, marry, or enter into any lawful union without fear of retaliation, termination, or disciplinary action. Respect for all identities is a core value of our funding partnerships. 

    Faith & Belief Systems
    Organizations must ensure that no employee, participant, volunteer, Board member, or leader—including the President or Executive Director—is required or inadvertently positioned to subscribe to, participate in, or pledge belief in any specific religion, faith tradition, or belief system. We support inclusive environments where individuals of all beliefs are welcome and respected.

APPLICANT PREFERENCES

  • We prioritize funding to organizations whose purpose is to support humans, directly and primarily. While many efforts impact human lives (e.g. providing free animal food to our vulnerable neighbors, tending to our beloved hiking trails, or crafting much-needed legislation), our work centers those organizations who focus immediately on human needs and address those needs directly.

  • We believe in an Oregon that positions all of its people and communities to thrive — especially our BIPOC, LGBTQ+, immigrant, neurodivergent, differently-abled, and low-income neighbors.

    Such a future requires that we recognize, value, elevate, include, and advocate for those community members. While understanding the diverse regions, demographics, cultures, and circumstances of our state, we continue to prioritize partners who clearly understand the critical importance of equity, demonstrably commit to it, and integrate it into the daily work, objectives, and measures of the organization.

    This work takes practice and is ongoing; there is no mastery of this commitment and we understand that organizations may be uniquely positioned or developed in their efforts.

  • The nonprofit sector is among the most trusted in the nation. In their service to our communities, nonprofits are also critical stewards of individual, government, business, and private funding; they often employ some of Oregon’s most passionate, capable, and skilled leaders and volunteers. As such, we expect applicant organizations to manage their business and financial operations with the utmost responsibly, appropriately mitigate operational or financial risk, and demonstrate trusted, ethical, and effective leadership over time.

    Such management and leadership not only encourages our own investments, but builds further community, employee, volunteer, and donor trust and retention.

  • The many timely and important needs throughout our state and region require our collective attention and investment. Yet as a single private foundation, our award capacity has its limits and as such, we rely on proven metrics to understand the breadth, depth, and scale of organizational impact over time — and prioritize efforts that directly impact the community. Not only do these metrics and efforts help us to understand the success of the organization, but they prove themselves critical to nonprofit storytelling, self-assessment, strategic development, and long-term viability.

    How an organization collects and reports data, leverages and communicates research, or practices ongoing operational learning can often be indicative of its long-term success.

  • Beyond our commitment to arts, creativity, education, mentorship, health, and well-being, we also work to affirm that organizations are unquestionably aligned with our guiding values. While you can learn more about what we do or do not fund here, we continue to prioritize applicants whose efforts are holistically aligned (across all programs and operations) and demonstrate impact here in Oregon. Moreover, we value those partnerships that prove direct human impact, especially on youth or our most marginalized community members.

  • We recognize that all of our applicants have philanthropic needs. In some cases, that need is exceptionally clear. However, for those organizations whose operations are more robust (e.g. universities, hospitals) or whose long-term efforts have secured considerable savings, reserves, or endowments, we do still expect that the need for funding be well articulated. Certainly, financial responsibility and operational complexity can be commendable and often motivate our philanthropic investments, yet no matter the size or scope of an organization, our work requires us to make difficult funding decisions that often consider the scope of need relative to that of other high-need applicants. We encourage prospective partners to consider this prior to pursuing funding.

  • We continue to prioritize efforts that focus right here in Oregon. Similarly, those efforts that are led by and for community are especially valued in our funding process.

THE PROCESS

Month 1
The application period opens for 4–5 weeks, typically in January and June.

Month 2
We conduct an initial review of all submitted applications to identify finalist organizations. All applicants are notified of their status following this review.

Months 3 & 4
Program Officers engage closely with finalist organizations to gain a deeper understanding of their work. This step helps us develop thoughtful evaluations and issue informed funding recommendations.

Month 5
Program Officers present their funding recommendations to our Board for final review and approval.

Month 6
Finalists are notified of the Board’s funding decisions, and grant funds are distributed accordingly.

PRELIMINARY APPLICATION (or LOI)

Our Preliminary Application (LOI) for the Rose & Daffodil Grants is being updated and abbreviated. Please check back in early May for an updated version or email us at grants@marielamfrom.org with any questions.

FINAL APPLICATION

In general, our final application is unique in that the prompts and questions assigned to applicants are personalized to each organization.

We use your Preliminary Application (LOI) responses and other resources (e.g. website, Form 990) to curate specific questions relevant to our own learning. This eliminates time spent on irrelevant questions and expedites the application process. Final application questions will be assigned to applicants when the application is made available to them. Additional questions or prompts may be assigned by Program Officers during the evaluative process.

Note to Applicants

We include our application questions on our website as a courtesy and in an effort to award applicants additional time to prepare. The questions and prompts included here are subject to change and may not be precisely identical to those in our application. Additionally, the questions themselves are not comprehensive, with drop down options and some administrative prompts (e.g. secondary instruction) excluded. If a prompt is unclear to you on our website, please kindly first review it in the application (once open) before contacting us for clarifications.

Before applying:

We encourage applicants to consider these recommendations before submitting a preliminary application.

  • We don’t want ineligible organizations to unnecessarily pursue a grant. Review our eligibility criteria here.

    Organizations are not eligible to apply for a Sunflower, Rose, or Daffodil grant until any other Primary Grant (Sunflower, Rose, or Daffodil) is closed. In other words, if you are in a Rose Grant now, you cannot reapply until:

    • Your 12-month grant term has closed

    • Your final report is submitted

    • All or nearly all of the awarded funding has been expensed

    Organizations with grant terms ending during an open application cycle are asked to wait until the following grant cycle opens to apply.

    With questions about reapplication eligibility, please contact us.

  • In a competitive process, it can be tempting to exaggerate data or reframe narratives to be more agreeable to our interests. We will not issue funding to (and will likely bar from future funding) applicants that knowingly or intentionally misrepresent data, narratives, or financial information.

  • We aren’t always looking for the “obvious” response. In fact, for a single prompt, many responses carry little value on their own, but are instead given value in the context of other responses. Selecting the prompt that you think we want, instead of that which is most accurate or applicable, may position us to misunderstand or wrongly interpret your work.

  • With hundreds of applications received each cycle, it is challenging for us to permit applicants to edit or change applications once submitted. Please review your submission for accuracy, including financial statements and other attachments, before you submit.

  • We use your organizational profile (in our grant portal) to learn about your Mission and collect other data points. Updating that profile — including address and contact information — ensures that you don’t have to repeat information later in the application itself, leaving more room for new information or a more abbreviated response.

  • While we work to clarify confusing or incomplete responses, we are sometimes unable to do so depending on the scope of clarification needed. We especially encourage organizations to review financial statements for accuracy and clarity. Organizations should also keep character limits in mind.

  • As artificial intelligence resources expand, we recognize the value of these tools in reviewing narratives, revising content to meet character counts, or proof-reading material. While we do not oppose use of these resources, we remind applicants that you are singularly responsible for the content of your submission. Mistakes or errors made on AI platforms are the responsibility of the applicant.